Calculate exact token footprints, measure context window consumption across Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Gemini, and optimize your repository prompt budgets before AI-driven refactoring.
AI coding tools like Cursor, Claude Dev/Cline, and Windsurf rely on prompt context to generate high-quality code. Bloated context leads to degraded reasoning ("lost in the middle") and unnecessary cloud bills.
Instead of passing full function bodies across 50 files, extract only class signatures, type annotations, and docstrings. This preserves architectural knowledge while cutting 70-80% of tokens.
Lockfiles (`package-lock.json`, `poetry.lock`), build folders (`dist/`, `.next/`), and generated test snapshots can secretly blow through 100k+ tokens in a single agent request.
Use Creview's cyclomatic complexity metrics to identify the specific 5% of functions causing 80% of bugs, feeding only those high-risk nodes to LLMs for focused refactoring.
Research on long-context models shows that attention mechanisms degrade when searching for critical logic in massive prompts (the "needle-in-a-haystack" degradation). Smaller, structurally curated prompts consistently outperform raw whole-codebase dumps.
Yes. The full Creview application parses whole projects, calculating total token footprints per file and folder so you can plan agent budgets before initiating large refactoring sweeps.
No. Calculations on this page happen directly inside your browser. No code is transmitted to external servers or AI providers.